Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40570462›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Evaluation of cleaning and disinfection procedures on poultry farms.

Ingrid Hansson, Tomasz Dzieciolowski, Jesper Rydén, Sofia Boqvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingrid HanssonDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: Ingrid.Hansson@slu.se.
Tomasz DzieciolowskiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden; Kronfågel AB, Scandistandard, SE-104 25 Stockholm, Sweden.
Jesper RydénDepartment of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Sofia BoqvistDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper cleaning and disinfection (C&D) of broiler houses is essential to eliminate pathogenic bacteria and minimize the risk of transmitting harmful microorganisms to subsequent broiler flocks. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of various C&D methods, examine key factors influencing broiler house hygiene, and evaluate the impact of commonly used disinfectants. In the first part of the study, C&D procedures were evaluated. Eighteen broiler producers collected dip slide samples after disinfection from 20 control points within a broiler house over four production rotations, resulting in a total of 1,440 samples. The second part of the study assessed the effectiveness of four commonly used disinfectants on farms with broiler houses divided into four compartments, each cleaned under the same standardized protocol. Sampling was conducted by collecting 15 dip slides from each compartment both before and after disinfection over two production rounds at each farm, resulting in a total of 720 samples. Despite the large sample size, only a few factors significantly impacted the results. Pre-soaking surfaces with water before cleaning, combined with the use of detergents, were two improving factors. Additionally, fogging and high-pressure washing were also effective in reducing bacterial loads. To maximize bacterial reduction, disinfectants should be evenly applied across all surfaces. Neither the age nor the size of the houses showed a significant correlation with bacterial counts. When comparing the effectiveness of different disinfectants under identical cleaning routines and broiler house conditions, no significant differences were found between the substances. However, variations were observed among the different broiler producers, with one farm showing a greater bacterial reduction, with a reduction above 400 CFU at more control points compared to the other farms suggesting that overall farm hygiene plays a crucial role. Ultimately, effective C&D does not depend on the disinfectant but, rather, on the combined influence of all C&D variables, most importantly, on the diligence and technique of the person responsible for the process.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryChickensDisinfectantsDisinfectionHousing, AnimalAnimalsHygieneDisinfectantsBroiler houseChickenDip slideHygiene routinesPrevention

Identifiers

PMID40570462
PMCPMC12414267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.