Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40570284›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Diagnostic utility of real-time RT-PCR for chikungunya virus detection in the acute phase of infection: a retrospective study.

Anupama Sajith, Varsha Iyengar, Prasad Varamballi, Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay, Sudheesh Nittur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Surge of Chikungunya Cases in Central India, Post-COVID-19 Pandemic.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anupama SajithManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Virology, Manipal, India.
Varsha IyengarManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Virology, Manipal, India.
Prasad VaramballiManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Virology, Manipal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0384-1078
Chiranjay MukhopadhyayManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Virology, Manipal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-1143
Sudheesh NitturManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Virology, Manipal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3540-2865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChikungunya fever is a viral disease spread by Aedes mosquitoes, reported in over 110 countries. In India, it was first detected in Kolkata in 1963 and is now widespread. Diagnosis often relies on detecting anti-chikungunya IgM antibodies, but these may not be present during the acute phase as viremia can last up to 8 days, leading to underreporting. The present study aims to assess the diagnostic use of real-time RT-PCR for detecting chikungunya-specific nucleic acid in serum samples during the early stages of infection. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using archived samples collected as a part of 'the hospital-based Acute Febrile Illness (AFI) surveillance project'. AFI cases having fever ≤8 days and arthralgia without any aetiology between 2016 and 2018 from Karnataka, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu were included in the study. Samples were subjected to nucleic acid extraction followed by chikungunya real-time RT-PCR using a standardized in-house protocol. The samples that tested positive for Chikungunya by real-time RT-PCR were further tested for detecting anti-Chikungunya IgM antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Demographic characterization of the cases was performed using SPSS version 20 and GraphPad Prism version 10.

resultsOut of a total of 646 samples tested, 31 samples (4.79%) were positive by real-time RT-PCR for chikungunya virus, 20 of which had a Ct value of <30, indicating a relatively high viral load. Among the 31 serum samples tested for anti-Chikungunya IgM antibodies, only one showed a positive result. Demographic analysis showed that 67% of cases were male and 32% were female, respectively. Clinical data analysis showed that most of the cases presented with cough (87%), headache (80.6%), myalgia (77.4%), coryza (70.9%), vomiting (58%), and abdominal pain (38.7%).

conclusionThe current study findings highlight the importance of screening patients with fever for up to 8 days and arthralgia for not only detecting IgM antibodies against chikungunya using ELISA but also for chikungunya virus-specific nucleic acid through real-time PCR/nucleic acid amplification techniques, or other methods. Not performing laboratory tests to screen for chikungunya-specific nucleic acid or antigen may result in underreporting of chikungunya cases, thereby impacting effective control measures and management of cases.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverChikungunya virusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin MIndiaMaleAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin MRNA, ViralAFIarthralgiaChikungunyagood health and well-beinglaboratory diagnosisreal-time RT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID40570284
PMCPMC12203700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.