ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Diagnostic utility of real-time RT-PCR for chikungunya virus detection in the acute phase of infection: a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A brief review of chikungunya fever: From molecular virology to countermeasures.Infectious medicine · 2026Review
- Application of CRISPR-Cas12a/Cas13a dual enzyme cleavage technology in the differential diagnosis of Chikungunya virus and Dengue virus.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Chikungunya in 2025: Comprehensive Insights into Virology, Diagnostics, Vaccines, and Antiviral Therapies.Viruses · 2026Review
- Surge of Chikungunya Cases in Central India, Post-COVID-19 Pandemic.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Chikungunya fever: pathogenesis and mechanisms underlying pain symptoms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChikungunya fever is a viral disease spread by Aedes mosquitoes, reported in over 110 countries. In India, it was first detected in Kolkata in 1963 and is now widespread. Diagnosis often relies on detecting anti-chikungunya IgM antibodies, but these may not be present during the acute phase as viremia can last up to 8 days, leading to underreporting. The present study aims to assess the diagnostic use of real-time RT-PCR for detecting chikungunya-specific nucleic acid in serum samples during the early stages of infection. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using archived samples collected as a part of 'the hospital-based Acute Febrile Illness (AFI) surveillance project'. AFI cases having fever ≤8 days and arthralgia without any aetiology between 2016 and 2018 from Karnataka, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu were included in the study. Samples were subjected to nucleic acid extraction followed by chikungunya real-time RT-PCR using a standardized in-house protocol. The samples that tested positive for Chikungunya by real-time RT-PCR were further tested for detecting anti-Chikungunya IgM antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Demographic characterization of the cases was performed using SPSS version 20 and GraphPad Prism version 10.
resultsOut of a total of 646 samples tested, 31 samples (4.79%) were positive by real-time RT-PCR for chikungunya virus, 20 of which had a Ct value of <30, indicating a relatively high viral load. Among the 31 serum samples tested for anti-Chikungunya IgM antibodies, only one showed a positive result. Demographic analysis showed that 67% of cases were male and 32% were female, respectively. Clinical data analysis showed that most of the cases presented with cough (87%), headache (80.6%), myalgia (77.4%), coryza (70.9%), vomiting (58%), and abdominal pain (38.7%).
conclusionThe current study findings highlight the importance of screening patients with fever for up to 8 days and arthralgia for not only detecting IgM antibodies against chikungunya using ELISA but also for chikungunya virus-specific nucleic acid through real-time PCR/nucleic acid amplification techniques, or other methods. Not performing laboratory tests to screen for chikungunya-specific nucleic acid or antigen may result in underreporting of chikungunya cases, thereby impacting effective control measures and management of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.