Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40570258›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2025

Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating a Combined Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor RNA Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LIQUIK).

Jens Samol, David Ng, Jonathan Poh, Min-Han Tan, Richa Dawar, Jennifer Carney, James Orsini, Katherine Scilla, Yew Oo Tan, Tan Min Chin and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04703153 (LIQUIK), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04703153 unknown statusnot on this map

LIQUIK: LIQUId Biopsy for Detection of Actionable Genomic BiomarKers in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

TypeobservationalSponsorLucence Health Inc.Ran2021 to 2024Enrolled151ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jens SamolMedical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6109-3528
David NgMedical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Jonathan PohLucence Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-8667
Min-Han TanLucence Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA.
Richa DawarUniversity of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-8846-1263
Jennifer CarneyKaiser Permanente Hawaii Moanalua Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.
James OrsiniNew Jersey Cancer Care, Belleville, NJ.ORCID 0009-0002-6642-2823
Katherine ScillaUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-7904-8119
Yew Oo TanIcon Cancer Centre, Farrer Park, Singapore.
Tan Min ChinParkway Cancer Centre, Singapore.
Chee Keong TohCurie Oncology, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-6144
Boon Cher GohNational University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4107-102X
Gilberto LopesUniversity of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-1151-9903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the performance of a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) liquid biopsy, LiquidHALLMARK (LHM), compared with tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Guardant360 CDx (G360 ctDNA) liquid biopsy for biomarker detection in metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis multicenter, prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04703153) enrolled patients across the United States and Singapore. Patients were tested with tissue NGS, LHM, and G360 ctDNA. The primary objective was noninferiority of LHM ctDNA to tissue NGS and G360 ctDNA. Secondary analyses included turnaround time (TAT), overall response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS), with exploratory analysis of the clinical utility of ctRNA.

resultsLHM ctDNA (48.2%) detected 11.4% fewer biomarker-positive patients than tissue NGS (59.6%) and did not meet noninferiority criteria. Compared with tissue NGS, LHM ctDNA and G360 ctDNA were concordant in 72.1% and 66.1% of patients, establishing noninferiority of LHM ctDNA to G360 ctDNA (

conclusionLHM ctDNA is noninferior to G360 ctDNA, but not tissue NGS. Treatment outcomes based on liquid biopsy are comparable with those based on tissue NGS. Incorporation of ctRNA into LHM ctDNA improves the diagnostic yield of actionable, tissue NGS-confirmed gene rearrangements.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNALung NeoplasmsRNA, NeoplasmAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNARNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40570258
PMCPMC12203978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.