Cognitive Task Analysis to Evaluate Resident Physician Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
   Article
2. Teaching common cognitive biases and associated errors in veterinary neurologic diagnosis using clinical vignettes: a narrative review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
   Review
3. Cognitive Task Analysis to Understand and Overcome Heuristics in Medical Residents: Even More Relevant in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.ATS scholar · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Cognitive Task Analysis to Understand and Overcome Heuristics in Medical Residents: Even More Relevant in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.2025

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as