ReviewThe Biochemical journal2025
Methods to accelerate PROTAC drug discovery.
Review in The Biochemical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A DoE-Dual centrifugation-driven screening platform for liposomal incorporation of poorly soluble APIs: Application to the PROTAC ACBI2.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Bridging E3 Ligase Binding and Targeted Degradation Through Fluorescence Polarization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Targeted Lysosomal Degradation of Extracellular and Membrane Proteins: From Receptor Hijacking to Programmable Endolysosomal Routing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Induced proximity-based therapeutics for advanced prostate cancer.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Precision-Engineered PROTACs: Integrating Physical and Chemical Strategies for Targeted Cancer Therapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- SE(3)-PROTACs: Geometric deep learning for PROTAC degradation prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Targeted Protein Degradation in Cancer: PROTACs, New Targets, and Clinical Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- PROTAC-PatentDB: A PROTAC Patent Compound Dataset.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in the Development of Pro-PROTAC for Selective Protein Degradation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) represent a novel and promising modality for probing biological systems, elucidating pharmacological mechanisms, and identifying potential therapeutic leads. The field has made significant strides, as demonstrated by the growing number of PROTACs advancing to clinical trials. Despite this progress, the development of PROTACs faces significant challenges, which is partially due to the heterobivalent nature of this class of molecules. PROTACs must simultaneously bind to a protein of interest and an E3 ubiquitin ligase. This means PROTACs are significantly larger and more complex than conventional small molecules. This complexity impacts their design and synthesis, requiring strategic approaches to create libraries of PROTACs with various combinations of target ligands, linkers, and E3 ligase-recruiting elements. To fully realise the potential of this innovative technology, there is a need for novel approaches to accelerate the development of PROTACs. This review focuses on three critical areas to accelerate PROTAC development: appropriate target selection, modular chemical synthesis, and high-throughput biological evaluation. By appropriate selection of target proteins for degradation, optimizing synthesis methods to handle the complexity of PROTAC molecules, and employing robust high-throughput biological assays to evaluate PROTAC activity, researchers in academia and industry have streamlined the development and increased the success rate of PROTAC-based discovery programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.