SynthesisAmerican journal of hypertension2025
Postpartum Blood Pressure Screening in the United States Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in American journal of hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimely blood pressure (BP) screening is not consistently performed for new mothers. Only 60% complete a 6-week postpartum visit, and even fewer are evaluated within 1 week. This timing is crucial since mortality is highest in the first 6 days. Primary care has a role to play in improving postpartum BP care. However, research has yet to fully explore primary care-driven strategies for postpartum BP screening.
objectiveThis review aims to identify primary care postpartum BP screening strategies and to understand the characteristics of patients who are completing BP screenings within 1 week.
methodsWe used the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published since 2010. Included studies were conducted in the United States and of English-language publications.
resultsWe identified 13,452 articles and synthesized 32 studies. Of 11,270 postpartum patients, 40% (n = 4,790) identified as Black/African American race. For recruitment, 24 (75.0%) studies focused on high-risk patients, 5 (15.6%) compared high-risk to low-risk patients, and 3 (9.4%) studies recruited all patients with no restrictions. Studies often reported BP ascertainment within 1-week postpartum (53.1%; n = 17). Further, 12 (37.5%) studies incorporated both in-clinic and in-home settings for postpartum BP screening, 10 (31.2%) were in-clinic, and 10 (31.2%) were in-home.
conclusionsWe found that primary care systems are evaluating BP within 1-week postpartum, leveraging remote BP monitoring and child-wellness checks. Those strategies, however, less often included low-risk patients. Updated guidelines are needed to cover postpartum BP screening for patients with uncomplicated pregnancies and the absence of other risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.