ArticlePloS one2025
Comparative investigation of bagging enhanced machine learning for early detection of HCV infections using class imbalance technique with feature selection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Around 1.5 million new cases of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) are diagnosed globally each year (World Health Organization, 2023). Consequently, there is a pressing need for early diagnostic methods for HCV. This study investigates the prognostic accuracy of several ensemble machine learning (ML) models for diagnosing HCV infection. The study utilizes a dataset comprising demographic information of 615 individuals suspected of having HCV infection. Additionally, the research employs oversampling and undersampling techniques to address class imbalances in the dataset and conducts feature reduction using the F-test in one-way analysis of variance. Ensemble ML methods, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), and Decision Tree (DT), are used to predict HCV infection. The performance of these ensemble methods is evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, G-mean, balanced accuracy, cross-validation (CV), area under the curve (AUC), standard deviation, and error rate. Compared with previous studies, the Bagging k-NN model demonstrated superior performance under oversampling conditions, achieving 98.37% accuracy, 98.23% CV score, 97.67% precision, 97.93% recall, 98.18% selectivity, 97.79% F1 score, 98.06% balanced accuracy, 98.05% G-mean, a 1.63% error rate, 0.98 AUC, and a standard deviation of 0.192. This study highlights the potential of ensemble ML approaches in improving the diagnosis of HCV. The findings provide a foundation for developing accurate predictive methods for HCV diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.