Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40570028›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Attractive targeted sugar baits for malaria control in western Kenya (ATSB-Kenya) - Effect of ATSBs on epidemiologic and entomologic indicators: A Phase III, open-label, cluster-randomised, controlled trial.

Caroline Ogwang, Aaron M Samuels, Daniel P McDermott, Alice Kamau, Maia Lesosky, Kizito Obiet, Julia M Janssen, Wycliffe Odongo, John E Gimnig, Julie R Gutman and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05219565 (Phase III, Open-label, Community-based, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Cost-effectiveness, and Acceptability of Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05219565 nacompletednot on this map

Phase III, Open-label, Community-based, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Cost-effectiveness, and Acceptability of Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSB) for Malaria Burden Reduction in Western Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,962ConditionsMalariaArmsAttractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Caroline OgwangKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2689-9459
Aaron M SamuelsDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8355-8186
Daniel P McDermottDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Alice KamauKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Maia LesoskyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-958X
Kizito ObietKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Julia M JanssenDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Wycliffe OdongoDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
John E GimnigKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Julie R GutmanDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Jonathan S SchultzDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-5333
Oliver TowettKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4675-4301
Brian SedaKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4714-3140
Mercy ChepkiruiKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Margaret MuchokiKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Seline OmondiKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jackline KosgeiKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Brian PoloKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Frank AduwoKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Kephas OtienoKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Martin J DonnellyDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Simon KariukiKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Eric OchomoKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Feiko Ter KuileKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Sarah G StaedkeKEMRI Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSBs) are a novel malaria control tool designed to target mosquitoes outdoors. We conducted a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the impact of ATSBs on malaria indicators in Kenya. Seventy clusters (≥100 households/cluster) in Siaya county were randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention or control. Pyrethroid-only long-lasting insecticidal nets were distributed to all clusters, aiming for universal coverage. Two ATSBs containing dinotefuran were hung outside household structures in intervention clusters. ATSBs were monitored every two months and replaced every six months over two years. Three consecutive cohorts of randomly selected children (1- < 15 years) were enrolled, aiming to accrue 1,260 person-years over two years of follow-up. Incidence of clinical malaria (fever with a positive malaria test) was the primary outcome. A multilevel Poisson regression model was applied, with clusters as a random intercept and study arm as a fixed effect. Secondary outcomes were malaria prevalence in community residents (≥1 month), and parity of mosquitos captured through human landing catches. In March 2022, ATSBs were delivered to 33,180 of 33,419 (99.3%) household structures in intervention clusters. Overall, 268,268 ATSBs were deployed over two years. Of 2,962 cohort children enrolled (intervention = 1,497; control = 1,465), 2,869 (96.9%) were included in the primary analysis (intervention = 1,461; control = 1,408), contributing 1,445 person-years of follow-up. Malaria incidence was 1.32 episodes per person-years in the intervention arm versus 1.20 in the control (unadjusted incidence rate ratio 1.11; 95% CI: 0.75-1.65; p = 0.598). Of 7,488 community residents surveyed (intervention = 3,760; control = 3,728), 1,474 (39.2%) intervention and 1,461 (39.2%) control participants tested positive for malaria (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% CI: 0.60-1.59; p = 0.93). Of 6,457 female anopheles mosquitoes collected (intervention = 4,058; control = 2,399), 3,579 (88.2%) intervention and 1,973 (82.2%) control mosquitoes were parous (OR 1.34; 95% CI: 0.91-1.99; p = 0.14). In Kenya, we found no evidence that ATSBs reduced clinical malaria incidence, malaria prevalence, or vector parity. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05219565), 22 January 2022.

Identifiers

PMID40570028
PMCPMC12200848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.