ArticlePloS one2025
Characterizing the content and quality of internet resources on exercise training in Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes and generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS) and Generalized Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder (G-HSD) experience musculoskeletal joint instability, cardiopulmonary manifestations, and functional limitations with online exercise resources commonly utilized. This study characterizes and assesses the content, quality, and readability of websites addressing exercise training for individuals with EDS/G-HSD.
methodsThe first 350 English websites were Googled using search terms "Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and exercise" and "Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and physical activity," targeting educational/instructional sites on exercise training for adults with EDS/G-HSD. Content was assessed using scientific consensus criteria, quality using Modified DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and readability using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesh-Reading Ease Scores (FRES).
results78/350 unique websites were included, most from industry organizations (37%) and personal commentary (24%). The mean content score was moderate 13.8 ± 4.4/25. The content most discussed included: short/long-term benefits of muscle strength, resistance training, and generalized exercise safety considerations. Median modified DISCERN and GQS scores were 4/5 IQR [3-4] and 3/5[2.3-4], respectively. Mean PEMAT understandability and actionability scores were 85% ± 12% and 69% ± 23%, respectively. Average FKGL was 11.0 ± 2.7 and FRES was 43.6 ± 7.2. Moderate-strong Spearman correlations were observed between total content scores and GQS (rho = 0.76) and DISCERN (rho = 0.52), p < 0.001 for both.
conclusionWebsite content varied, most addressing general safety recommendations and multiple training modalities. While quality was moderate-to-good, future resources should focus on simplified language, actionable guidance, and visual aids. Incorporating practical examples of daily activities, injury prevention strategies, broader benefits like cardiovascular health, and psychological support can empower safe and confident exercise training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.