Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569992›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A mixed methods exploration of motor imagery in autistic and non-autistic adults: Diverse experiences and implications for interventions.

Molly Brillinger, Ying Bai, April Karlinsky, Timothy N Welsh, Ellen Poliakoff, Emma Gowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A GRASS-guided phased progressive brain-computer interface approach for post-infarction hand motor recovery.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Molly BrillingerFaculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-5557
Ying BaiDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2820-1766
April KarlinskyDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University-San Bernardino, San Bernardino, California, United States of America.
Timothy N WelshFaculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ellen PoliakoffDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Emma GowenDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on motor imagery (MI) in non-autistic individuals suggests that there are shared neural circuitries between imagery and execution. The relationship between imagined and executed movements, and the use of MI in autistic adults is poorly understood. This study explored MI comprehension, prior use of MI, and subjective experiences during MI in autistic and non-autistic adults. Twenty autistic and twenty non-autistic individuals responded to a series of questions probing their understanding of and engagement in MI. Participants then completed the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ), and reported on their subjective experiences during MI. Although there were no differences between the autistic and non-autistic individuals in their understanding of MI, the non-autistic group may have more prior use of MI in their everyday lives. Additionally, autistic participants generally reported less vivid imagery on the KVIQ compared to non-autistic participants, however experiences during MI varied widely across both groups ranging from vivid/intense images/sensations to the inability to imagine. In summary, some autistic individuals are able to engage in MI, but, similar to their non-autistic peers, MI ability and experiences vary across individuals. This work has important implications for MI interventions aimed at improving motor coordination.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderImagery, PsychotherapyImaginationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40569992
PMCPMC12200693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.