Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569984›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Validation of the Kidsights Measurement Tool: A parent-reported instrument to track children's development at the population level.

Marcus R Waldman, Katelyn Hepworth, Jolene Johnson, Kelsey M Tourek, Kelly J Jones, Yaritza Estrada Garcia, Laura M Fritz, Abbey Siebler, Abbie Raikes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcus R WaldmanDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3288-4803
Katelyn HepworthDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Jolene JohnsonMunroe-Meyer Institute, Education and Child Development, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Kelsey M TourekMunroe-Meyer Institute, Education and Child Development, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Kelly J JonesMunroe-Meyer Institute, Education and Child Development, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Yaritza Estrada GarciaMunroe-Meyer Institute, Education and Child Development, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Laura M FritzMunroe-Meyer Institute, Education and Child Development, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Abbey SieblerMunroe-Meyer Institute, Education and Child Development, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Abbie RaikesDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities in child development between groups of children arise early and reflect social inequities in early environments, geography, and other factors. To track and address these disparities, valid and reliable tools are needed that can be implemented at-scale and across populations. However, no population-level measures of child development appropriate for children from birth to age five years have been developed and validated in the United States to date. The Kidsights Measurement Tool (KMT) is a parent-report, population-level tool for children birth to age five years intended to track group-level differences in the developmental status across normative aspects of children's motor, cognitive, language, and social/emotional development. This study reports on validation of KMT as a feasible tool that can be implemented in large-scale surveys to track disparities in early childhood development. Using a sample of N = 5,001 initial parent reports residing in Nebraska and across the United States, we find strong evidence that the KMT can detect disparities in child development birth to age five, as indicated by expected criterion associations with parent education and mental health, as well as child's race and ethnicity. In addition, we found that the KMT is strongly associated with gold-standard direct observation instruments (i.e., the Bayley Scale of Infant Development and the Woodcock-Johnson) that measure similar developmental constructs both concurrently and one-year 12-24 months later. Finally, the KMT exhibits strong reliability even after controlling for age, and we find no evidence that measurement noninvariance threatens valid inferences about group difference. Taken together, our findings indicate that a parent-report measure can generate valid and useful estimates for tracking disparities in early child development at the population level.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentParentsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40569984
PMCPMC12200676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.