ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Challenges in detecting and predicting adverse drug events via distributed analysis of electronic health record data from German university hospitals.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A distributed analysis approach for pharmacovigilance data from electronic medical records in German university hospitals: the POLAR_MI ETL Pipeline.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- [Evidence generation and methodological consultation by the project "EVAluation research based on data from routine clinical care 4 the Medical Informatics Initiative" (EVA4MII)].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Association with Falls During Hospitalisation: An Analysis Based on Electronic Health Records (POLAR_MI project).Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Medical Informatics Initiative Germany (MII) aims to facilitate the interoperability and exchange of electronic health record data from all German university hospitals. The MII use case "POLyphamacy, drug interActions and Risks" (POLAR_MI) was designed to retrospectively detect medication-related risks in adult inpatients. As part of POLAR_MI, we aimed to build predictive models for specific adverse events. Here, using the two adverse events gastrointestinal bleeding and drug-related hypoglycaemia as examples, we present our initial investigation to determine whether these adverse events and their associations with potential risk factors can be detected. We applied a two-step distributed analysis approach to electronic health record data from 2018 to 2021. This approach consisted of a local statistical data analysis at ten participating centres, followed by a mixed-effects meta-analysis. For each adverse event, two multivariable logistic regression models were constructed: (1) including only demographics, diagnoses and medications, and (2) extended by laboratory values. As numerically stable estimations of both models were not possible at each centre, we constructed different centre subgroups for meta-analyses. We received prevalence estimates of around 1.2% for GI bleeding and around 3.0% for drug-related hypoglycaemia. Although unavailability of laboratory values was a common reason hindering model estimation, multivariable regression models were obtained for both adverse events from several centres. Regarding our original intention to build predictive models, the median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was above 0.70 for all multivariable regression models, indicating feasibility. In conclusion, plausible estimates for prevalence and regression modelling odds ratios were received when using a distributed analysis approach on inpatient treatment data from diverse German university hospitals. Our results suggest that the development of predictive models in a distributed setting is possible if the research question is adapted to the infrastructure and the available data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.