Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569944›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Challenges in detecting and predicting adverse drug events via distributed analysis of electronic health record data from German university hospitals.

Anna Maria Wermund, Torsten Thalheim, André Medek, Florian Schmidt, Thomas Peschel, Alexander Strübing, Daniel Neumann, André Scherag, Markus Loeffler, Miriam Kesselmeier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna Maria WermundDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-0197
Torsten ThalheimInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5489-7405
André MedekMedical & Scientific Technology Development & Coordination (MWTek), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Florian SchmidtInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas PeschelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander StrübingInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Daniel NeumannInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
André ScheragInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences (IMSID), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Markus LoefflerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Miriam KesselmeierInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences (IMSID), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-2579
Ulrich JaehdeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-7370
POLAR_MI Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Medical Informatics Initiative Germany (MII) aims to facilitate the interoperability and exchange of electronic health record data from all German university hospitals. The MII use case "POLyphamacy, drug interActions and Risks" (POLAR_MI) was designed to retrospectively detect medication-related risks in adult inpatients. As part of POLAR_MI, we aimed to build predictive models for specific adverse events. Here, using the two adverse events gastrointestinal bleeding and drug-related hypoglycaemia as examples, we present our initial investigation to determine whether these adverse events and their associations with potential risk factors can be detected. We applied a two-step distributed analysis approach to electronic health record data from 2018 to 2021. This approach consisted of a local statistical data analysis at ten participating centres, followed by a mixed-effects meta-analysis. For each adverse event, two multivariable logistic regression models were constructed: (1) including only demographics, diagnoses and medications, and (2) extended by laboratory values. As numerically stable estimations of both models were not possible at each centre, we constructed different centre subgroups for meta-analyses. We received prevalence estimates of around 1.2% for GI bleeding and around 3.0% for drug-related hypoglycaemia. Although unavailability of laboratory values was a common reason hindering model estimation, multivariable regression models were obtained for both adverse events from several centres. Regarding our original intention to build predictive models, the median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was above 0.70 for all multivariable regression models, indicating feasibility. In conclusion, plausible estimates for prevalence and regression modelling odds ratios were received when using a distributed analysis approach on inpatient treatment data from diverse German university hospitals. Our results suggest that the development of predictive models in a distributed setting is possible if the research question is adapted to the infrastructure and the available data.

Identifiers

PMID40569944
PMCPMC12200832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.