ArticlePLOS global public health2025
The feasibility of respondent-driven sampling with people who use drugs in rural Western Cape, South Africa: A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Cigarettes led me back to smoking tik": lived experience perspectives on tobacco use during substance use treatment and recovery in South Africa.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Western Cape is South Africa's epicentre for tuberculosis (TB) and smoked drug use such as methamphetamine and methaqualone (Mandrax). Despite this, there are limited studies on people who smoke drugs (PWSD) with TB disease in South Africa, partly due to recruitment challenges. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a network-based sampling method used to recruit such key populations. The aim of this qualitative study is to explore the appropriateness and feasibility of RDS as a method for recruiting PWSD for a planned study on TB transmission in this setting. We conducted ten focus group discussions (n = 84) with men and women from Worcester, a rural town in the Western Cape, who self-reported current methamphetamine and/or methaqualone use. Participants were recruited through an existing TB study or community-based outreach. Discussion topics included use of illicit drugs within social networks, feasibility of using RDS methods for recruiting PWSD, and logistical recommendations for the use of RDS and planned study participation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results indicate drug use by participants across large social networks which is favorable for RDS methods. The key themes were: 1) drug-use social network characteristics including demographic and geographic differences; 2) perspectives of PWSD on RDS methods; 3) potential challenges to proposed RDS recruitment and participation in a larger research study for PWSD, and 4) participant recommendations to enhance the uptake of RDS and study participation by PWSD. RDS seems to be a feasible method to recruit PWSD and improve the possibility of reaching a diverse sample of PWSD, with clear recommendations from participants regarding how to recruit participants for larger research studies. The current study indicates that conducting formative, qualitative research can assist researchers with RDS study design and planning for additional study activities. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT041515602.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.