ArticlePloS one2025
Informal employment, population health, and welfare policies: A global empirical analysis between 2011-2021.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite informal employment being the most common type of employment globally, the empirical link between informality and health is underexplored. Using time-series, cross sectional data from the International Labor Organization (ILO) on informal employment for roughly 126 countries between 2011-2021, this study applies OLS regression to explore how informality associates with population health, measured as healthy life expectancy (HALE), maternal mortality, under-five mortality, equality of access to health care, and mortality due to communicable diseases and maternal and prenatal undernutrition. We also address whether this relationship is conditioned by the availability of higher quality welfare state. The results show that informality associates with a host of measures of poor health, controlling for important confounders, but it associates weakly positively with HALE. Contrary to expectations, an accessible welfare state does not condition informality in ways that lower the health burden. Our results are possibly not causal but subject to endogeneity bias since bad health conditions could lead to increased welfare policies. Longer time series of informal employment data is needed for further assessment. The basic results, however, point to a connection between the size of the informal workforce and diminished population health, controlling for important confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.