ArticlePloS one2025
Research on mechanical characteristics and key technology of integral intelligent lifting construction of large-span heavy steel box girder.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to address the problems of aerial orientation control and safety in sudden extreme working conditions during the integral intelligent lifting of large-span heavy steel box girder. Based on the project of Xiaotun Bridge of Fuyi Expressway, a new integral lifting system and control method were proposed. To prevent extreme conditions during the lifting process, the mechanical properties of steel box girders in both synchronous and asynchronous integral lifting states were investigated using the finite element method. Moreover, the mechanical properties of the steel box girders during the lifting process were analyzed through on-site monitoring. The results show that an alignment device has been added to the existing synchronous hydraulic lifting system, which achieves precise control of the aerial orientation and stress of each component of the steel box girder through informal lifting, micromotion lifting and other methods. In the synchronous lifting condition, the failure of the lifting point will cause the redistribution of internal forces in the lifting sling, thereby endangering the lifting lugs, but the stress and deformation of the steel box girder change relatively little. In the asynchronized lifting condition, the use of double lifting points may potentially result in overturning and torsion of the girder. However, under the asynchronous lifting within the displacement error limits, the overall mechanical performance of the steel box girder meets the codes. The on-site monitoring results correlate closely with the simulation results for the normal lifting conditions of the steel box girder. The maximum stress and vertical displacement of the steel box girder are approximately 74 MPa and 70 mm, respectively, indicating that the overall girder structure is safe and reliable throughout the entire lifting process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.