Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569913›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Retrospective evaluation of Facial nerve monitoring to prevent nerve damage during robotic drilling in the largest series of patients undergoing the HEARO-procedure.

Jaouad Abari, Marco Matulic, Pablo Galeazzi, Masoud Zoka Assadi, Paul Van de Heyning, Vedat Topsakal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaouad AbariDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5141-4292
Marco MatulicCASCINATION AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Pablo GaleazziMED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria.
Masoud Zoka AssadiMED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria.
Paul Van de HeyningDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vedat TopsakalVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-4005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRobot-assisted cochlear implantation surgery (RACIS) involves the drilling of a keyhole access to the inner ear for cochlear implant placement to treat patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. RACIS with the HEARO-procedure does not require the drilling of a mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy to pass through the facial recess. Instead, it directly drills through it guarding a safe distance from both the facial nerve and chorda tympani. Cochlear implantation surgery involves a well described risk for facial nerve injury when passing through the facial recess. Neuromonitoring as a safety protocol gained great importance in conventional CI surgery and is proving its benefits in RACIS. RACIS in the HEARO-procedure involves a customized facial nerve monitoring (FNM) device that was designed and tested in an animal model study. Here, this device was retrospectively assessed in the largest series of patients undergoing the HEARO-procedure. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe safety protocol in the HEARO-procedure involves FNM and intra-operative cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging with a 0.1 mm spatial resolution. The customized FNM device was employed, using both active mono- and bipolar stimulation to estimate the distance to the facial nerve in RACIS. Linear regression was used to determine if the minimum stimulation thresholds (FNM) could significantly predict the intra-operative distance (CBCT) between the drilled trajectory and the facial nerve. Logistic regression was used to calculate if FNM can distinguish distances smaller and greater than 0.4 mm to the facial nerve.

resultsThe minimum stimulation thresholds significantly predicted the distances between the drilling trajectory and the facial nerve for both the monopolar (p = 0.001) and bipolar 3 (p = 0.008) stimulation configuration. Both the monopolar (β = -0.189, S.E. = 0.063, p = 0.003) and bipolar 3 (β = -0.187, S.E. = 0.080, p = 0.019) stimulation configuration are negative and significant predictors of the probability of the distance being smaller than 0.4 mm.

conclusionFNM will alert the surgeon when the drilling trajectory comes closer than 0.4 mm to the facial nerve in RACIS. A linear relationship was observed between the minimum stimulation thresholds and the intra-operative distance towards the facial nerve.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationFacial NerveFacial Nerve InjuriesHearing Loss, SensorineuralRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40569913
PMCPMC12200655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.