ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
SpyDen: simplifying molecular and structural analysis across spines and dendrites.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Competitive processes shape multi-synapse plasticity along dendritic segments.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationInvestigating the molecular composition of different neural compartments such as axons, dendrites, or synapses is critical for understanding learning and memory. State-of-the-art microscopy techniques now resolve individual molecules and pinpoint their position with a micrometer or nanometre resolution across hundreds of micrometres, allowing the labelling of multiple structures of interest simultaneously. Algorithmically, tracking individual molecules across hundreds of micrometres and determining whether they are inside a particular cellular compartment can be challenging. Historically, microscopy images are annotated manually, often using multiple software packages to detect fluorescence puncta and quantify cellular compartments of interest. Advanced ANN-based automated tools, while powerful, often can only help with selected parts of the data analysis, may be optimized for specific spatial resolutions, cell preparations, and may not be fully open source and open access to be sufficiently customizable.
resultsThus, we developed SpyDen, a Python package based upon three principles: (i) ease of use for multi-task scenarios, (ii) open-source accessibility and data export to a standard, open data format, (iii) the ability to edit any software-generated annotation and generalize across spatial resolutions. SpyDen operates on 2D microscopy time-series data, offering robust temporal tracking and spatial analysis capabilities. Equipped with a graphical user interface and accompanied by video tutorials, SpyDen provides a collection of powerful algorithms that can be used for neurite and synapse detection, fluorescent puncta, and intensity analysis. We validated SpyDen using expert annotation across numerous use cases to prove a powerful, integrated platform for efficient and reproducible molecular imaging analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SpyDen is available on https://github.com/meggl23/SpyDen while the compiled executables can be found at https://gin.g-node.org/CompNeuroNetworks/SpyDenTrainedNetwork.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.