Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569845›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

Implementing the new WHO guidelines on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis: perspectives from five African countries.

Sarah Magni, Daniel Byamukama, Maryam Sani Haske, Jane Mukami, Idah Moyo, Judith D Auerbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. HIV Post Exposure Prophylaxis: prospects, opportunities and challenges.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah MagniGenesis Analytics, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Daniel ByamukamaHIV Prevention, Uganda AIDS Commission, Kampala, Uganda.
Maryam Sani HaskeCommunity Prevention and Care Services, National Agency for the Control of AIDS, Abuja, Nigeria.
Jane MukamiPreventive and Curative Department, National Syndemic Disease Control Council, Nairobi, Kenya.
Idah MoyoMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Judith D AuerbachDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3508-9888

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation #INV-053199Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation #INV-073717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an important component of comprehensive HIV prevention, yet its uptake has been suboptimal globally. In July 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its global guidance on PEP to include two new recommendations intended to increase timely access to and delivery of PEP. These recommendations specifically aim to expand both where PEP can be delivered, to include community settings, and who can provide PEP, to include community health workers and task-sharing. The practical realities of adopting new public health guidelines to achieve the intended benefits in most contexts are complex. Articulating these realities is important for identifying what will be required to ensure the feasibility of expanded PEP access in community settings. DISCUSSION: We provide stakeholder perspectives from five African countries-Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe-on both barriers to and strategies for implementing the new WHO PEP recommendations. These perspectives are informed by experiences in these countries that were shared at a recent workshop and highlight key themes related to PEP uptake and use: awareness and acceptability; administration and monitoring; policy alignment, including regulatory considerations; logistics; integration of services; stakeholder involvement and capacity building; and linking PEP and PrEP more directly. Running across these themes are the roles of socio-cultural norms and the need for increased resources to pay for implementing the recommendations, including capacity strengthening and monitoring in communities.

conclusionsWhile significant challenges exist to expanding PEP access in community settings and through task-sharing, there are examples from our countries of successful efforts to mitigate them by leveraging existing community resources and capacities in innovative ways. Additional efforts will require engagement across multiple stakeholders to address remaining awareness gaps, logistical and regulatory obstacles, and political will. As countries work to update their guidelines and align with the new WHO recommendations, continued collaboration and innovation within and across countries will be essential to realize the full potential of PEP in comprehensive HIV prevention efforts.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisPractice Guidelines as TopicAfricaHumansWorld Health Organizationglobal guidanceHIV PEPHIV preventionPEP to PrEPpost‐exposure prophylaxisWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID40569845
PMCPMC12231651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.