Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569825›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2025

Largest genome assembly in Brassicaceae: retrotransposon-driven genome expansion and karyotype evolution in Matthiola incana.

Daozong Chen, Taihua Yang, Haidong Chen, Xiaohan Zhang, Fan Huang, Shubei Wan, Zhanjun Lu, Chao Liu, Yong Lei, Huifang Jiang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daozong Chen *College of Life Sciences, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Greenhouse Vegetable, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China.
Taihua Yang *National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Research Center of Rapeseed Engineering and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-1989
Haidong ChenCollege of Life Sciences, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Greenhouse Vegetable, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China.
Xiaohan ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Research Center of Rapeseed Engineering and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Fan HuangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Research Center of Rapeseed Engineering and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Shubei WanCollege of Life Sciences, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Greenhouse Vegetable, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China.
Zhanjun LuCollege of Life Sciences, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Greenhouse Vegetable, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China.
Chao LiuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Research Center of Rapeseed Engineering and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yong LeiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (OCRI-CAAS), Wuhan, China.
Huifang JiangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (OCRI-CAAS), Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-205X
Boshou LiaoKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (OCRI-CAAS), Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-8175
Graham J KingRecombics, Alstonville, 2477, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-6051
Martin A LysakCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC) and Department of Experimental Botany, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-4194
Chen TanCollege of Life Sciences, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Greenhouse Vegetable, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China.
Xianhong GeNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Research Center of Rapeseed Engineering and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3950-210X

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 25-16142SNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1600500National Natural Science Foundation of China 32160454;32260469Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20212BAB215002The project TowArds Next GENeration Crops (CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004581) of the ERDF Programme Johannes Amos ComeniusWuhan Science and Technology Major Project on Key techniques of biological breeding and Breeding of new varieties 2022021302024851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matthiola incana, commonly known as stock and gillyflower, is a widely grown ornamental plant whose genome is significantly larger than that of other species in the mustard family. However, the evolutionary history behind such a large genome (~2 Gb) is still unknown. Here, we have succeeded in obtaining a high-quality chromosome-scale genome assembly of M. incana by integrating PacBio HiFi reads, Illumina short reads and Hi-C data. The resulting genome consists of seven pseudochromosomes with a length of 1965 Mb and 38 245 gene models. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that M. incana and other taxa of the supertribe Hesperodae represent an early-diverging lineage in the evolutionary history of the Brassicaceae. Through a comparative analysis, we revisited the ancestral Hesperodae karyotype (AHK, n = 7) and found several differences from the well-established ancestral crucifer karyotype (ACK, n = 8) model, including extensive inter- and intra-chromosomal rearrangements. Our results suggest that the primary reason for genome obesity in M. incana is the massive expansion of long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs), particularly from the Angela, Athila and Retand families. CHG methylation modification is obviously reduced in the regions where the highest density of Copia-type LTR-RTs and the lowest density of Gypsy-type LTR-RTs overlap, corresponding to the putative centromeres. Based on insertion times and methylation profiling, recently inserted LTR-RTs were found to have a significantly different methylation pattern compared to older ones.

Indexed as

BrassicaceaeEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantRetroelementsChromosomes, PlantKaryotypePhylogenyRetroelementsCruciferaegenome assemblygenome obesityHesperodaeLineage IIIretrotransposons

Identifiers

PMID40569825
PMCPMC12392961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.