ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Selective Conservatism in the Management of Spinal Stab Wounds Remains Applicable-A Critical Review of 169 Patients Managed at a Major Trauma Center in South Africa.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal stab wounds (SW) are relatively uncommon and can be both morbid and fatal. The exact role of surgery remains somewhat unclear. This study reviews our institutional experience of spinal SW management and examines the clinical outcome of these patients in a developing world setting.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted over a 10-year study period from December 2012-December 2022 at a major trauma center in South Africa. All patients who sustained spinal SW were included.
resultsOne hundred sixty-nine patients with spinal SW were included (male: 87%, mean age: 28 years, median Injury Severity Score [ISS]: 9). AIS classifications: E (51%), C (18%), A (14%), D (12%), B (4%). Nearly all patients (95%) underwent CT scan and 81% had an MRI. 72% had bony injury and 60% had spinal cord injury. Five percent of all patients underwent surgical intervention. Overall, 5% of patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 9% had one or more complications. Common complications were hospital acquired pneumonia and pressure sores. The overall in hospital mortality rate was 1% (2/169). Of the 167 patients who survived to hospital discharge, 88% were discharged to spinal rehabilitation centers and the remaining patients were discharged home.
conclusionsOur study supports a conservative management in select SW patients, especially in the absence of progressive neurological deficits or spinal instability. Non-operative management aligns well with resource-constrained public healthcare facilities in our environment. Further research should aim to develop context-specific guidelines to refine surgical decision-making and improve outcomes across varied healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.