ArticleEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2025
Negligible influence of limescale deposits on faucet aerators on measured microorganism loads.
Article in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relevance in question: A rare case of Actinomyces radicidentis bacteremia.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study was conducted to assess the effects of limescale deposits on faucet aerators on the qualitative and quantitative detection of microorganisms from swabbing and first jet water samples. Methods: Limescale deposits on faucet aerators were categorized into three groups: not / slightly calcified, moderately calcified and heavily calcified. Colonization was assessed by isolating microorganisms from standardized swabbing and water samples. Microorganisms isolated from the aerators were compared with clinical isolates from the same year. Results: Regardless of the degree of calcification on the faucet aerators, similar numbers and types of microorganisms were found. Except for Staphylococcus epidermidis and the rare occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus and Nacaseomyces glabratus on the aerators, there were no matches between the microorganisms isolated from the aerators and the top ten clinical isolates. Microorganisms frequently isolated from aerators, such as Sphingomonas paucimobilis, were extremely rare in clinical samples. No differences in species were observed based on the degree of calcification of the aerators. Conclusions: The study did not demonstrate a significant effect of the degree of calcification on the colonization of aerators. Although calcification of aerators as a risk factor for increased microbial transmission cannot be entirely dismissed, its importance appears to be secondary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.