Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569605›Full record

ArticleGeobiology

Two Worlds on a Stone: Arctic Desert Hypoliths and Epiliths Show Spatial Niche Differentiation.

Andrew Baker, Dale Stokes, Anushree Srivastava, Shannon Rupert, Charles S Cockell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew BakerUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Dale StokesScripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, California, USA.
Anushree SrivastavaCarnegie Institute of Science, Washington, DC, USA.
Shannon RupertMars Society, San Diego, California, USA.
Charles S CockellUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3662-0503

Funding

Science and Technology Facilities Council ST/V000586/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Arctic polar deserts, rocks can be extensively colonized by phototrophic hypolithic communities that exploit periglacial sorting processes to grow beneath opaque rocks. These communities are distinguished by green bands that are distinctly and abruptly separated from the black-pigmented communities on the rock surface (epiliths). We used 16S and 18S rDNA culture-independent methods to address the hypothesis that the two communities are different. Although both communities were dominated by cyanobacterial species (Chroococcidiopsis and Nostoc spp.), we found that the hypolithic and epilithic habitats host distinct microbial communities. We found that eukaryotic hypolithic and epilithic communities were statistically similar but that the hypolithic habitats contained tardigrade DNA, showing that the more clement subsurface habitat supports animal life in contrast to the surface of the rocks. These results reveal the distinctive communities and sharp demarcations that can develop across small spatial scales in the Earth's rocky extreme environments.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaEcosystemGeologic SedimentsArctic RegionsDesert ClimateDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence Analysis, DNATardigradaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID40569605
PMCPMC12199873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.