Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569558›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025

From image to index: diagnostic accuracy of a novel semi-quantitative approach for assessing suspected periprosthetic joint infection with triple-phase bone scintigraphy.

Rosanna Del Carmen Zambrano-Infantino, Jean Félix Piñerúa-Gonsálvez, Francisco Sebastian-Palacid, Noelia Álvarez-Mena, María Mercedes Alonso-Rodríguez, Ricardo Ruano-Pérez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosanna Del Carmen Zambrano-InfantinoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. rosannamedicina@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-5948
Jean Félix Piñerúa-GonsálvezDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Francisco Sebastian-PalacidDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Noelia Álvarez-MenaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
María Mercedes Alonso-RodríguezDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Ricardo Ruano-PérezDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee and hip arthroplasty are common procedures for patients with osteoarthritis when conservative therapy fails. Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection are major complications, with periprosthetic joint infection being a leading cause of pain post-surgery. This study aims to assess the accuracy of a novel semi-quantitative parameter, the Blood Pool-To-Delayed Ratio (BPrDr) variation index, for assessing suspected periprosthetic joint infection in the hip and knee.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Nuclear Medicine department at Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, between October 2018 and December 2020, including patients who underwent surgery for suspected prosthetic joint infection. The Blood Pool ratio (BPr) was calculated by comparing the affected and contralateral joint areas during the blood-pool phase. The Delayed Ratio (Dr) was determined similarly in the delayed phase, and the BPrDr variation index was calculated as [(Dr-BPr)/BPr] × 100. Findings were compared with microbiological culture and intraoperative joint fluid analysis.

resultsSixty-four patients were included; microbiological examination was positive for infection in 17. The BPrDr variation index showed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI 0.57-0.85; P = 0.009). The optimal cut-off for differentiating infection from aseptic loosening was 14.73%, with sensitivity of 88.2%, specificity of 55.3%, positive predictive value of 41.6%, and negative predictive value of 92.8%.

conclusionThe BPrDr variation index may be a useful screening tool for ruling out periprosthetic joint infection in the hip and knee after joint replacement.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesProsthesis-Related InfectionsRadionuclide ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesProsthesis-related infectionsRadionuclide imagingTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40569558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.