ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025
Self-supervised learning for MRI reconstruction: a review and new perspective.
Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated knee MRI segmentation with KneeSeg-U for cartilage and bone extraction using an unsupervised deep learning framework.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo review the latest developments in self-supervised deep learning (DL) techniques for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction, emphasizing their potential to overcome the limitations of supervised methods dependent on fully sampled k-space data.
backgroundWhile DL has significantly advanced MRI, supervised approaches require large amounts of fully sampled k-space data for training-a major limitation given the impracticality and expense of acquiring such data clinically. Self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising alternative, enabling model training using only undersampled k-space data, thereby enhancing feasibility and driving research interest.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review to synthesize recent progress in self-supervised DL for MRI reconstruction. The analysis focused on methods and architectures designed to improve image quality, reduce scanning time, and address data scarcity challenges, drawing from peer-reviewed publications and technical innovations in the field.
conclusionsSelf-supervised DL holds transformative potential for MRI reconstruction, offering solutions to data limitations while maintaining image quality and accelerating scans. Key challenges include robustness across diverse anatomies, standardization of validation, and clinical integration. Future research should prioritize hybrid methodologies, domain-specific adaptations, and rigorous clinical validation. This review consolidates advancements and unresolved issues, providing a foundation for next-generation medical imaging technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40569542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.