Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569493›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

A comparative analysis of staple height used for robotic right colectomy.

Pranav Hinduja, Iram S Alam, Mehmet Gulmez, Yadin Bornstein, Olivia Delau, Chady Atallah, Bashar Safar, Michael J Grieco

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pranav HindujaDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Iram S AlamDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Mehmet GulmezDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Yadin BornsteinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Olivia DelauDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Chady AtallahDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Bashar SafarDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Michael J GriecoDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. michael.grieco@nyulangone.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of a closed staple height of less than 3.5 mm in right colon resections remains poorly defined, with limited comparative data against the traditionally used 3.5 mm staplers. To compare rates of anastomotic bleeding and other complications between two staple heights (2.5 mm, white cartridge versus 3.5 mm, blue cartridge) used for intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis in robotic right hemicolectomies. This is a retrospective study. The investigation is based on data from a tertiary care center. All patients who underwent a robotic right hemicolectomy or robotic extended right hemicolectomy with an intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for dysplasia or cancer from August 2018 to February 2024. The primary outcome was the anastomotic bleeding rate. A total of 120 patients were included of which 64 patients (53.3%) were female. Group 1 comprised of 52 patients (43.3%) in whom white cartridges were used for ileocolic anastomosis, and group 2 had 68 patients (56.6%) for whom a blue cartridge was used either for the resection of the colon, creation of the anastomosis, or both. A total of 14 patients (11.6%) had anastomotic bleeding. This was managed conservatively with hemodynamic monitoring and blood transfusions in 13 patients (93%), and one patient required a lower endoscopy. The incidence of anastomotic bleeding was almost twice as high in group 2 at 14.7% compared to only 7.6% in group 1 (p = 0.23). No anastomotic leaks were observed in this study. The retrospective nature of the study and inclusion of a single specialized center. The use of staplers with reduced staple height while performing robotic right colon resections may reduce the incidence of bleeding complications without an increase in rates of other complications. Further investigation with large-scale and randomized patient populations is warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

ColectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical StaplersSurgical StaplingAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalColonColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIleumMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAnastomotic bleedingIntracorporeal anastomosisRobotic right colectomyStaple heightSurgical outcomesSurgical stapler

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.