SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
Systematic review of the training process of minimally invasive surgery in neonates and infants.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trainee involvement in laparoscopic pyloromyotomy does not compromise outcomes: evidence from a longitudinal institutional experience.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Pediatric cholecystectomy practices and training: an International Multicenter Survey by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Section of Paediatric Surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Nationwide utilization patterns and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive pediatric nephrectomy in Germany.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) in neonates and infants presents technical challenges and is still unfamiliar to many paediatrics surgeons. This study aims to identify currently available simulators for neonatal/infant MIS training, to assess their validity, level of evidence, and related recommendations.
methodsThe review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250581050). Electronic search limited to English articles was performed through PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Database from January 2010 to June 2024.
resultsOut of 1084 identified records, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed across general, gastrointestinal, thoracic, and urological MIS specialties. Recent efforts have led to the development of 3D-printed, animal-based, and hybrid models several of which showed high fidelity, skill differentiation, and educational value. Despite promising results, no universal MIS training model exists for neonate/infant patients, highlighting the need for structured, proficiency-based curricula. Overall, studies demonstrated moderate levels of evidence and recommendation, supporting integration of cost-effective simulation into paediatrics MIS training
conclusionThis systematic review highlights the need for validated, standardized simulation models and proficiency-based curricula to optimize neonate and infant MIS training and guide future research toward improving model fidelity, accessibility, and long-term educational outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.