ArticleBiodegradation2025
Machine learning-based optimization of biogas and methane yields in UASB reactors for treating domestic wastewater.
Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to optimize biogas and methane production from Up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors for treating domestic wastewater using advanced machine learning models-namely, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and its hybridized form, XGBoost, integrated with particle swarm optimization (XGBoost-PSO). The key operational variables included time, flow rate, chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, volatile fatty acids, total suspended solids, hydraulic retention time, alkalinity, and the organic loading rate. Empirical data used to train and validate the predictive models were acquired from the sequential treatment of laboratory-prepared low-strength synthetic wastewater and actual municipal wastewater samples. Data was collected from two treatment phases: synthetic wastewater (COD: 335.45 ± 28.32 mg/L) was treated from days 0 to 270, followed by real domestic wastewater (COD: 225.28 ± 65.98 mg/L) from days 0 to 130. Gas production was continuously monitored throughout. The XGBoost-PSO model outperformed the standard XGBoost algorithm in both the training and testing phases. For biogas prediction during training, XGBoost-PSO achieved an RMSE of 0.0405, an MAE of 0.0225, and an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
40569466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.