Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569457›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025

Comparing ventral and dorsal oral mucosal graft urethroplasty in female urethral stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mazhar Ortac, M Firat Ozervarli, Rifat Burak Ergul, Arda Tunc Aydinoglu, Mevlut Melih Bicer, Teresa Olsen Ekerhult, Senol Tonyali, Assoc Prof

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mazhar OrtacDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey. mazhar.ortac@istanbul.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-5209
M Firat OzervarliDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.
Rifat Burak ErgulDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.
Arda Tunc AydinogluDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.
Mevlut Melih BicerDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.
Teresa Olsen EkerhultDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Senol TonyaliDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.
Assoc ProfDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReconstructive surgical options have become an alternative for female urethral stricture. Dorsal and ventral methods using oral mucosa grafts have been described, but their superiority over each other has not been evaluated. In this meta-analysis, the outcomes of dorsal and ventral techniques with oral mucosa graft in female urethroplasty have been compared. MATERIAL AND

methodA systematic search of Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis statement. Manuscripts published until February 2025 that reported the use of dorsal or ventral surgical approaches with oral mucosa grafts in female urethroplasty included. Success, determined based on the recurrence rate, was analyzed and compared between both groups. Complications were presented in both groups to evaluate the safety of the surgical technique.

resultsA total of 320 studies were identified, with 25 meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis, including four comparative cohort studies, showed no significant difference in surgical success between the dorsal (62/69 patients) and ventral (93/103 patients) techniques (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.30-2.36, p = 0.74). In the pooled analysis combining both comparative and non-comparative studies, the success rates for the dorsal and ventral techniques were 92.1% (95% CI: 89.1-95.1) and 95.5% (95% CI: 92.8-98.2), respectively, with no significant heterogeneity. A total of 4 cases of stress urinary incontinence complications were reported in the ventral approach, while 2 cases were reported using the dorsal approach. The majority of the studies (21 out of 25) provided Level 4 evidence, with only two randomized controlled trials reaching Level 2.

conclusionThis meta-analysis confirms that both dorsal and ventral approaches are effective for treating female urethral stricture, with high success rates. There was no statistically significant difference in success rates between the ventral and dorsal approaches. Surgical approach selection should depend on patient factors and surgeon expertise to achieve optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

Mouth MucosaPlastic Surgery ProceduresUrethraUrethral StrictureFemaleHumansUrologic Surgical ProceduresBuccal mucosaDorsalFemale urethroplastyOral mucosal graftVentral

Identifiers

PMID40569457
PMCPMC12202565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.