ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2025
Methodology for contamination detection and reduction in fermentation processes using machine learning.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hybrid Intelligence for Fouling Prediction and Adaptive Clean-in-Place Optimization in Food Processing Heat Exchangers: A Systematic Review.Journal of food science · 2026Pooled it
- Recent Progress in Artificial Intelligence in Biosensor Development: From Bioprobe Design to Fabrication and Signal Analysis.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper demonstrates an accurate and efficient methodology for fermentation contamination detection and reduction using two machine learning (ML) methods, including one-class support vector machine and autoencoders. We also optimize as many hyperparameters as possible prior to the training of the ML models to improve the model accuracy and efficiency, and choose a Python platform called Optuna, to enable the parallel execution of hyperparameter optimization (HPO). We recommend using Bayesian optimization with hyperband algorithm to carry out HPO. Results show that we can predict contaminated fermentation batches with recall up to 1.0 without sacrificing the precision and specificity of non-contaminated batches, which read up to 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. One-class support vector machine outperforms autoencoders in terms of precision and specificity even though they both achieve an outstanding recall of 1.0. These models demonstrate high accuracy in detecting contamination without requiring labeled contaminated data and are suitable for integration into real-time fermentation monitoring systems with minimal latency and retraining needs. In addition, we benchmark our ML methods against a traditional threshold-based contamination detection approach (mean
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.