Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569345›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms (Santa Fe province, Argentina).

Peña Agostina, Boidi Flavia Jaquelina, Welschen Nicolás, Cicotello Joaquín, Alvarado Wanda, Aliprandi Diego, Miotti Camila, Zbrun María Virginia, Suárez Archilla Guillermo, Lencina Florencia Aylen and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from aquatic products in the Southern Fujian coast, China.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peña Agostina *Instituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Boidi Flavia Jaquelina *Instituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Welschen NicolásInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Cicotello JoaquínInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Alvarado WandaInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Aliprandi DiegoInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Miotti CamilaInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Zbrun María VirginiaInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Suárez Archilla GuillermoInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Lencina Florencia AylenLaboratorio de análisis de alimentos, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias (ICiVet Litoral), Universidad Nacional del Litoral - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (UNL-CONICET), Esperanza, Argentina.
Signorini Marcelo LisandroInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Camussone Cecilia MaríaInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina. camussone.cecilia@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4952-4000
Molineri Ana InésInstituto de Investigación de La Cadena Láctea (INTA-CONICET), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, Ruta 34, Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Funding

Agencia Santafesina de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación IO-2019- 214Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PIP 2021-2023 GI 11220200101110COConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PUE 22920220100017COFondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT-2021-CAT-II-00084Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria 2019-PD-E5 I104-001Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria 2019-PE-E1-I018Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria 2023-PD-I115Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria 2023-PD-I118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant global threat, with E. coli serving as an indicator for resistance patterns in pathogens. This study evaluated the prevalence of AMR in E. coli isolates from dairy farms in Santa Fe, Argentina, focusing on two animal categories: pre-weaned calves and lactating cows. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2019 to March 2020, yielding 545 E. coli isolates from fecal samples across 54 dairy farms and three collective calf-rearing farms. Resistance was assessed using the disc diffusion test for multiple antimicrobial classes. The study revealed a higher risk of AMR in calf isolates compared to cow isolates, particularly for gentamicin and tetracycline. A significant proportion of isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR, 25.13%), with MDR isolates predominantly found in calves and collective calf-rearing farms. The MDR isolates were 9 times more probable to be found in calves than in cows (OR = 9.09; P < 0.001). The most frequent antimicrobial (AM) class combination in MDR E. coli isolates were beta-lactams, tetracyclines, and quinolones (75.18%). This study highlights the need for targeted interventions to manage AM use, particularly in young livestock, to mitigate the rise of AMR and its implications for both animal and public health.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCattle DiseasesDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsAnimalsArgentinaCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDairyingFarmsFecesFemaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleDairy productionEpidemiologyOne health

Identifiers

PMID40569345
PMCPMC12350860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.