Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569343›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Synthetic Data for Sharing and Exploration in High-Performance Sport: Considerations for Application.

John Warmenhoven, Franco M Impellizzeri, Ian Shrier, Andrew D Vigotsky, Lorenzo Lolli, Paolo Menaspà, Aaron J Coutts, Maurizio Fanchini, Giles Hooker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John WarmenhovenSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. john.warmenhoven@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8594-6481
Franco M ImpellizzeriSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia.
Ian ShrierCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Andrew D VigotskyDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Statistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Lorenzo LolliDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Paolo MenaspàAustralian Institute of Sport, Australian Sports Commission, Canberra, Australia.
Aaron J CouttsSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia.
Maurizio FanchiniAS Roma Performance Department, AS Roma Football Club, Rome, Italy.
Giles HookerResearch School of Finance, Actuarial Science and Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynthetic data represent alternative data sources generated using mathematical procedures to address specific issues in research and practice. Synthetic data have emerging applications in clinical and medical data contexts and may assist in overcoming privacy issues to help support open science practice.

objectiveThe present study discusses the applicability of an established synthetic data generation process using sequential tree-based algorithms (synthpop package in R) in the context of athlete monitoring data in sport, with the aim of providing an educational primer and discussion for potential application of these methods when exploring issues in the field sports and exercise sciences.

methodsThe software package in R, synthpop, was used in seven simulation conditions applied to a professional football dataset, with varying model constraints. Classification and regression trees were used as the base model framework for each simulation. Metrics associated with both global utility (overall dataset similarity) and specific utility (specific research outcome similarity) were assessed on each simulation condition.

resultsAll simulation conditions demonstrated high levels of global utility. Additionally, simpler simulation conditions, which more closely resembled the analysis of the original dataset (simulation condition 1 and 2), provided higher specific utility than more advanced simulation conditions.

conclusionTo summarize, three types of models can be conceptualised for generating synthetic data: (1) models used for analysis of the original data (answering specific research questions), (2) models used to generate synthetic data, and (3) models that represent the true generation process for the original data. Misalignments in the specifications of these models might introduce biases that can compromise the utility of synthetic data no matter the purpose. As synthetic data do not constitute a direct replacement for real data from conceptual and empirical standpoints, we believe that researchers embracing this practice must include sufficient documentation concerning the synthetic data generation process purpose, the predictors and model used, and the potential boundary conditions for using the synthetic data in future investigations in sports and other fields.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsData ScienceDatasets as TopicHumansInformation Dissemination

Identifiers

PMID40569343
PMCPMC12460485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.