Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569315›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025

SWAG: long-term surgical workflow prediction with generative-based anticipation.

Maxence Boels, Yang Liu, Prokar Dasgupta, Alejandro Granados, Sebastien Ourselin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SurgAnt-ViVQA: learning to anticipate surgical events through GRU-driven temporal cross-attention.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Spartan: surgical peg-and-ring triplet and workflow anticipation benchmark.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Please follow the rules: surgical workflow recognition constrained by linear temporal logic.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maxence BoelsSurgical and Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, USA. maxence.boels@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5793-7191
Yang LiuSurgical and Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, USA.
Prokar DasguptaSurgical and Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, USA.
Alejandro GranadosSurgical and Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, USA.
Sebastien OurselinSurgical and Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, USA.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council 16427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile existing approaches excel at recognising current surgical phases, they provide limited foresight and intraoperative guidance into future procedural steps. Similarly, current anticipation methods are constrained to predicting short-term and single events, neglecting the dense, repetitive, and long sequential nature of surgical workflows. To address these needs and limitations, we propose SWAG (surgical workflow anticipative generation), a framework that combines phase recognition and anticipation using a generative approach.

methodsThis paper investigates two distinct decoding methods-single-pass (SP) and autoregressive (AR)-to generate sequences of future surgical phases at minute intervals over long horizons. We propose a novel embedding approach using class transition probabilities to enhance the accuracy of phase anticipation. Additionally, we propose a generative framework using remaining time regression to classification (R2C). SWAG was evaluated on two publicly available datasets, Cholec80 and AutoLaparo21.

resultsOur single-pass model with class transition probability embeddings (SP*) achieves 32.1% and 41.3% F1 scores over 20 and 30 min on Cholec80 and AutoLaparo21, respectively. Moreover, our approach competes with existing methods on phase remaining time regression, achieving weighted mean absolute errors of 0.32 and 0.48 min for 2- and 3-min horizons.

conclusionSWAG demonstrates versatility across generative decoding frameworks and classification and regression tasks to create temporal continuity between surgical workflow recognition and anticipation. Our method provides steps towards intraoperative surgical workflow generation for anticipation. PROJECT: https://maxboels.com/research/swag. .

Indexed as

Surgical Procedures, OperativeWorkflowHumansAutoLaparo21Cholec80Remaining time regressionSurgical phase recognitionSurgical workflow anticipationSurgical workflow generation

Identifiers

PMID40569315
PMCPMC12575541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.