ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Augmented reality in pelvic surgery: using an AR-headset as intraoperative radiation-free navigation tool.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility study of a robot-assisted endoscopic technique for plate osteosyntheses of the acetabulum and anterior pelvic ring.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026Article
- Precision medicine in orthopaedics: A review of current technologies and future directions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence assisted simulation and surgical video analytics for ophthalmic surgery training and competence development.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe incidence of acetabular and pelvic fractures is rising significantly. Pelvic ring fractures rank as the sixth most common fractures in adults, with the majority occurring in the elderly. Due to complications related to surgical approaches, with rates of up to 31%, there is an increasing demand for minimally invasive surgical techniques. Augmented Reality (AR) has the potential to facilitate spatial orientation by a sophisticated user interface. The aim of this study was to develop an AR-based, radiation-free navigation system for pelvic fractures.
methodsThe Microsoft® HoloLens 2 was used as the AR headset. The Unity® game engine was used for programming. Pelvic models from Sawbones® served as the model. Segmentation was performed using Slicer3D by Slicer Corporation. The symphysis and both anterior superior iliac spines were defined as anatomical reference points. Ten pelvic models were used for testing. A preoperatively defined drill trajectory was displayed to the surgeon. A total of 20 S1 screws and 19 S2 screws were placed using only AR navigation without visual access to the pelvic model. Screw placement was controlled using CT.
resultsThe matching process took an average of 3 min and 28 s. 18 out of 20 (90%) S1 screws and 3 out of 20 (15%) S2 screws were placed correctly. In most cases, no perforation occurred. The mean procedure time was 7 min for S1 screws and 5 min for S2 screws.
conclusionProper drilling was achieved by displaying the trajectories via AR, particularly for S1 screws, where a slightly wider drilling corridor was aimed for compared to S2 screws. No registration scan was necessary with our matching method. No intraoperative radiation was required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.