ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
Contrasting patterns in diversity and community assembly of bacterioplankton and three size fractions of protists in the South China Sea.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The microbial food web plays a critical role in marine ecosystems, composed of various cell sizes of microbial organisms. Here, high-throughput sequencing of the 16S and 18S rRNA genes was conducted to detect the community structure and distribution patterns of bacterioplankton (0.2 µm-2 µm) and three size fractions of protist communities, i.e., pico-protist (0.2 µm-2 µm), nano-protist (2 µm-20 µm), and micro-protist (20 µm-200 µm), in the euphotic zone of the South China Sea. The trophic mode compositions of protist communities varied significantly across three size fractions, characterized by a substantial prevalence of parasitic pico-protists (40% amplicon sequence variants) and a greater predominance of mixotrophic taxa within nano- and micro-protist communities. Furthermore, we detected stronger vertical stratification of bacterial and pico-protist communities, corresponding to the wider niche breadth of smaller cells and reliance on passive dispersal. Additionally, both bacterial and protist community assemblies were dominated by stochastic processes. The relative contribution of homogeneous selection in nano-protist community assembly was greater compared to other size fractions, probably related to high relative abundance of mixotrophs. In summary, our results suggest that both cell size and trophic mode affect marine microbial community assembly, and that neither the "size-plasticity" hypothesis nor the "size-dispersal" hypothesis fully matched microbial communities. Our analyses are important for a better understanding of the assemblage processes of marine epipelagic microbial communities and how they will respond to global change.IMPORTANCECell size is a key feature that influences microbial biology at both the cellular and community levels. Poorly understood is the extent to which diverse ecological factors influence the assembly of microbial communities of various sizes. Two important hypotheses addressing the mechanisms of biome assembly are "size-plasticity" and "size-dispersal." Here, we investigated epipelagic microbial communities to reveal differences in the ecological functions of various microbial sizes, to explore the association of ecological processes with niche and cell size, and to expand the current understanding of marine microbial community assemblages and their possible responses to future global change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.