Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40569075›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Infectious touching: Has COVID-19 changed our perceptions of social touch? A neural and behavioural study.

Dana Zoabi, Elinor Abado, Simone Shamay-Tsoory, Leehe Peled-Avron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana ZoabiSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Abba Khoshey 199, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0009-0005-3367-1534
Elinor AbadoSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Abba Khoshey 199, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9114-6245
Simone Shamay-TsoorySchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Abba Khoshey 199, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-5212
Leehe Peled-AvronPsychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 5290002, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-1031

Funding

Israel Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social touch serves as a pivotal element in stress reduction and cultivation of social bonds. The COVID-19 pandemic's constraints greatly affected social behaviour and may have reshaped human responses to such stimuli. We investigated the impact of COVID-19 on perceptions of interpersonal touch by comparing behavioural and electrophysiological data from pre- and peri-pandemic cohorts. Based on the vigilance-avoidance theory, we hypothesized that prolonged threat context of the pandemic would lead to reduced attentional and emotional engagement with social touch. Specifically, we expected that participants tested during the pandemic would rate social touch images as less pleasant and show lower amplitudes and longer latency in the P1 and lower amplitudes in the late positive potential (LPP) Electroencephalogram (EEG) components-markers of early attention and emotional processing-compared to pre-pandemic. Ninety participants rated the pleasantness of images showing human and inanimate touch or non-touch. As predicted, peri-pandemic participants rated social touch images as less pleasant than pre-pandemic participants. EEG analysis revealed a shift in P1 responses: while pre-pandemic participants showed higher P1 amplitudes for touch than non-touch stimuli, this distinction disappeared during the pandemic. No significant differences were found in LPP or P1. Results suggest that social distancing reduced the salience of interpersonal touch.

Indexed as

BrainCOVID-19Social BehaviorSocial PerceptionTouchTouch PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19EEGLPPP1Social touch

Identifiers

PMID40569075
PMCPMC13223738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.