ArticleThe British journal of surgery2025
Evaluation of pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in resectable oesophageal cancer: integrated analysis of individual patient data from phase III trials.
Article in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant nedaplatin and paclitaxel regimen with concurrent radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase II clinical trial.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Endpoint for Overall Survival in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery Consortium Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Response-adapted perioperative therapy for resectable esophageal cancer in the immunotherapy era: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Comparison of survival outcomes of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Conditional recurrence-free survival after curative esophagectomy: individual patient data analysis of 11 trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Survival after pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Molecular stratification of esophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for prognosis and treatment strategy.Oncogene · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis of response, survival, lymph node pattern, and immune microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Right place right time: the role of immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in medical imaging empowers precision neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Platelet Indices and ApoA1 as Predictive Markers in Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOverall survival (OS) is the standard endpoint for oncological treatment efficacy, but requires long follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate pCR as a surrogate for OS in oesophageal cancer.
methodsAn integrated analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from phase III trials comparing perioperative therapies for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer was conducted. Individual-level surrogacy between pCR and OS was assessed using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τ). A τ of 0.8 was considered a threshold for a good surrogate. As no method estimating τ between an ordinal endpoint and OS has been reported, a new method was proposed using the inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted estimator adjusted for tied data.
resultsOf 22 eligible trials, 10 provided IPD for 1641 patients, including 624 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; 45 (7.2%) achieved pCR) and 1017 who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT; 299 (29.4%) achieved pCR). In the NAC subgroup, patients with pCR had an HR for OS of 0.12 (95% c.i. 0.05 to 0.33), the C-index was 0.54 (95% c.i. 0.52 to 0.56), and τ was 0.256. In the NACRT subgroup, the HR was 0.57 (95% c.i. 0.47 to 0.70), the C-index was 0.56 (95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.58), and τ was 0.174. Hypothetical data suggested that achieving strong surrogacy (τ of 0.8) required an HR of 0.09 (95% c.i. 0.07 to 0.11).
conclusionAlthough pCR was correlated with OS, no evidence of individual-level surrogacy with OS was demonstrated, making it inappropriate to consider pCR as a surrogate endpoint for OS in resectable oesophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.