Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568913›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2025

Evaluation of pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in resectable oesophageal cancer: integrated analysis of individual patient data from phase III trials.

Jun Okui, Kengo Nagashima, Satoru Matsuda, Yasunori Sato, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Thomas Ruhstaller, Peter Thuss-Patience, Magnus Nilsson, Fredrik Klevebro, Lijie Tan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jun OkuiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-1347
Kengo NagashimaBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-9045
Satoru MatsudaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-2755
Yasunori SatoDepartment of Biostatistics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KawakuboDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Thomas RuhstallerCompetence Center of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Switzerland.
Peter Thuss-PatienceDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Magnus NilssonDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6215-8132
Fredrik KlevebroDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1695-4103
Lijie TanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shaoyuan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6187-4313
Thomas AparicioDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Guillaume PiessenUMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity, and Resistance to Therapies, University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Charlène van der ZijdenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3650-8303
Bianca MostertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5193-0820
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-3697
Takahiro TsushimaDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3551-7504
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1733-5072
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverall survival (OS) is the standard endpoint for oncological treatment efficacy, but requires long follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate pCR as a surrogate for OS in oesophageal cancer.

methodsAn integrated analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from phase III trials comparing perioperative therapies for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer was conducted. Individual-level surrogacy between pCR and OS was assessed using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τ). A τ of 0.8 was considered a threshold for a good surrogate. As no method estimating τ between an ordinal endpoint and OS has been reported, a new method was proposed using the inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted estimator adjusted for tied data.

resultsOf 22 eligible trials, 10 provided IPD for 1641 patients, including 624 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; 45 (7.2%) achieved pCR) and 1017 who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT; 299 (29.4%) achieved pCR). In the NAC subgroup, patients with pCR had an HR for OS of 0.12 (95% c.i. 0.05 to 0.33), the C-index was 0.54 (95% c.i. 0.52 to 0.56), and τ was 0.256. In the NACRT subgroup, the HR was 0.57 (95% c.i. 0.47 to 0.70), the C-index was 0.56 (95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.58), and τ was 0.174. Hypothetical data suggested that achieving strong surrogacy (τ of 0.8) required an HR of 0.09 (95% c.i. 0.07 to 0.11).

conclusionAlthough pCR was correlated with OS, no evidence of individual-level surrogacy with OS was demonstrated, making it inappropriate to consider pCR as a surrogate endpoint for OS in resectable oesophageal cancer.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsAgedClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40568913
PMCPMC12199242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.