ReviewGM crops & food2025
Feasibility of a safe innovation framework for crop breeding.
Review in GM crops & food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in genomic crop techniques and considerations for regulation and food safety.Transgenic research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biotechnological innovations accelerate the development of new plant varieties at an ever-increasing pace. A framework for safe innovation can create opportunities for the integration of safety considerations into each stage of the lifecycle of these products. Through stakeholder engagement, we discussed their views, preferences, as well as perceived challenges surrounding safe innovation and innovative biotechnological tools in the plant breeding sector. Furthermore, five scenarios for safe innovation frameworks were presented to them. Stakeholders from the Dutch plant breeding sector favored a self-regulated safety scenario, allowing the plant breeding sector to develop best practices with guidance from the government and independent researchers. Based on the stakeholders' views, we developed a draft voluntary framework for safe innovation named "Safe Innovation in Plant breeding (SIP) Framework," which is grounded in safe innovation principles, and focuses on food safety in particular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.