Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Maiko InoueDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan.
Apriadi SitumorangWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1879-3355
Jack H KellyWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9472-678X
Weiwei ChenWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.
Hui ZhuWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.
Carlotta C FerrarioDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 26, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-6180-0115
Veronica GregisDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 26, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1876-9849
Alessandro VajaniDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (DiSAA), University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.
Salar ShaafDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (DiSAA), University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-8273
Abhisek BiswasDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (DiSAA), University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9547-3606
Rana AlqusumiSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Mark T WatersSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-9005
Matthew R TuckerWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4661-6700
Dabing ZhangWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-9812
Stephanie J Watts-WilliamsWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-0662
Agnieszka JaniakInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, Katowice 40032, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0225-7216
Marek MarzecInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, Katowice 40032, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-6662
Beata ChmielewskaInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, Katowice 40032, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-741X
Laura RossiniDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (DiSAA), University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6509-9177
Kaori YoneyamaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3965-1647
Philip B BrewerWaite Research Institute, School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4871-9260
Funding
ARC Discovery Project DP24 0102441Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) ScholarshipAustralian Research Council FT180100081CLIMBER project fundedEuropean Union-NextGenerationEU- Project 1048European Union-NextGenerationEU- Project CUP G53D23004030006Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJFR220FJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H02125Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H02270MIURNational Recovery and Resilience PlanNCBRPlayford Trust ScholarshipSaudi Arabia Ministry of Higher Education-King Saud UniversitySouth Australian Grain Industry Trust UAD 02023Thyne Reid FoundationUniversity's 2019 SEED 1253
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Strigolactone (SL) mutants display a range of phenotypes, such as increased branching, reduced stature, and a loss of SLs exuded from roots into the soil. SL biosynthesis is complex and divergent between plant species. Recently, mutants defective in specific SL biosynthesis genes have shown a loss of exuded SLs, but no obvious change in branching (tillering). This means that functional specification may exist between certain SL subtypes. It has been suggested that the LATERAL BRANCHING OXIDOREDUCTASE (LBO) enzyme acts in a subpathway of SLs that is specific for branching. Here we report that barley plants mutant in hvlbo have increased tillering, but normal production of SLs detected in roots and root exudates. This finding supports the idea that SLs have functional or tissue-specific differences and that the LBO pathway has specificity for bud outgrowth rather than exudates.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
LATERAL BRANCHING OXIDOREDUCTASE specificity for strigolactone branching inhibition in barley. · full record | OpenQuestion