Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568725›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2025

Asciminib for Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias.

Timothy P Hughes, Deborah L White, David T Yeung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy P HughesPrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia. tim.hughes@sahmri.com.
Deborah L WhitePrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia.
David T YeungPrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty-five years after the introduction of imatinib, we have entered a new era of therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Despite the development of second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), their impact has been incremental in improving outcomes for CML patients. While frontline use of second-generation TKI has improved molecular response rates and reduced progression to blast phase, there has been no improvement in overall survival compared to that achieved with imatinib, likely due to the higher toxicity and consequent higher non-CML-related mortality. Imatinib remains the most prescribed therapy for CML worldwide, despite it being the least potent TKI and most prone to resistance and progression. Asciminib, the first STAMP (specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket) inhibitor, binds to the myristoyl pocket of BCR::ABL1. Its specificity minimizes off-target toxicity which enabes asciminib to finally break this frustrating link between potency and toxicity. After a decade of clinical trials, both in patients with resistance and intolerance to two or more TKI, and more recently in the frontline setting, asciminib is fulfilling its early promise of a more rapid and reliable pathway to long-term disease control with minimal toxicity. There are, however, some unexpected challenges when using asciminib that require further investigation. In this Spotlight Review we examine the key studies and outline the potential impact and current limitations of this first STAMP inhibitor in the CML setting and in other leukemias in which ABL1 or ABL2 is the key target.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositivePhiladelphia ChromosomeProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansNiacinamideAntineoplastic AgentsasciminibFusion Proteins, bcr-ablNiacinamideProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID40568725
PMCPMC12485309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.