Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568664›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Predictive performance of wearable sensors for mortality risk in older adults: a model development and validation study.

Charlie Harper, Adam D Sturge, Shing Chan, Ben Maylor, Alaina Shreves, Daniel Meier, Prachi Patkee, John Schoonbee, Adam Strange, Christoph Nabholz and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlie HarperNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-9832
Adam D SturgeNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6098-1339
Shing ChanNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9600-5575
Ben MaylorNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-0479
Alaina ShrevesNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Daniel MeierSwiss Re, Switzerland.
Prachi PatkeeSwiss Re, UK.
John SchoonbeeSwiss Re, Switzerland.
Adam StrangeSwiss Re, UK.
Christoph NabholzSwiss Re, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-3060
Derrick BennettNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Aiden DohertyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-0451

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many adults in high-income countries carry a device capable of measuring physical-activity behaviour. Thus, there is public health need to understand whether such data can enhance prediction of future health outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether device-measured daily-step count and walking cadence improve the prediction of mortality beyond traditional risk-factors. Methods: Risk models were developed to predict five-year all-cause mortality using data from the UK Biobank accelerometer sub-study, with external validation in the US 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Median daily-step count and peak one-minute walking cadence were derived using self-supervised machine learning models from seven-day wrist-worn accelerometer data. Cox models were used to develop a baseline model incorporating traditional risk-factors, and a baseline model plus accelerometer data (i.e. daily-steps and walking cadence). Changes in model performance were assessed using Harrell's C-index, net reclassification index (NRI; 10% threshold), and the Nam-D'Agostino calibration test. Findings: Among 79,717 UK Biobank participants, 1,640 died within 5-years. Adding accelerometer data to the baseline model modestly improved risk discrimination and classification with a change in c-index of 0.008 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.005-0.011) and 3.3% NRI (95%CI 2.1%-4.5%). Greatest improvements in prediction were observed in participants with prior disease at baseline, showing a change in c-index of 0.028 (95%CI 0.019-0.039) and 5.9% NRI (95%CI 3.1%-8.6%). In the NHANES external validation cohort (n=4,713; deaths=378), similar improvements in prediction were observed (change in c-index: 0.015, 95%CI 0.007-0.025; NRI: 4.0%, 95%CI 0.7%-7.4%). All models were well calibrated (Nam-D'Agostino χ Interpretation: Device-measured daily-step count and walking cadence consistently demonstrated modest improvements in predicting mortality risk beyond traditional risk-factors, with the most significant enhancements seen in individuals with prior disease. These findings suggest that incorporating information from wearables does provide important new ways to improve risk stratification for targeted intervention in high-risk individuals.

Indexed as

accelerometermortalityphysical activityrisk predictionstep count

Identifiers

PMID40568664
PMCPMC12191095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.