ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Assessing Large Language Model Performance Related to Aging in Genetic Conditions.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike some health conditions that have been extensively delineated throughout the lifespan, many genetic conditions are largely described in pediatric populations, with a focus on early manifestations like congenital anomalies and developmental delay. An apparent gap exists in understanding clinical features and optimal management as patients age. Generative artificial intelligence is transforming biomedical disciplines including through the introduction of large language models (LLMs). Motivated by these advances, we explored how LLMs handle age with respect to 282 genetic conditions selected based on prevalence. We divided these conditions into five categories: Disorders limited to childhood; Disorders limited to adulthood; Disorders with changes in presentation across ages; Disorders with changes in management across ages; Disorders with no changes across ages. We evaluated Llama-2-70b-chat (70b) and GPT-3.5 (GPT) capabilities at generating accurate medical vignettes for these conditions based on Correctness, Completeness, and Conciseness as graded by 3 clinicians. Using accurately generated vignettes as in-context prompts, we further generated and evaluated patient-geneticist dialogues and assessed LLM performance in answering specific questions regarding age-based management plans for a subset of conditions. Results revealed impressive performances of 70b with in-context prompting and GPT in generating vignettes. We overall did not observe age-based biases, though our experiments identified statistically significant differences in some areas related to LLM output. Despite impressive capabilities, LLMs still have limitations in clinical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.