ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Predicting ADC Map Quality from T2-Weighted MRI: A Deep Learning Approach for Early Quality Assessment to Assist Point-of-Care.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Poor quality prostate MRI images, especially ADC maps, can lead to missed lesions and unnecessary repeat scans. To address this issue, we aimed to develop an automated method to predict ADC map quality from T2 images acquired earlier in the scanning process. Materials and Methods: A paired multi-site image corpus of T2-weighted images and ADC maps was constructed from 486 patients imaged in-house and at 62 external clinics. A senior radiologist assigned 1-3 quality ratings to each image set, later converted to a binary "non-diagnostic" or "diagnostic" scale. A deep learning model and a rectal cross-sectional area measurement approach were developed to predict ADC image quality from T2 images. Model performance was evaluated retrospectively by accuracy, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value, and AUC. Results: No single acquisition parameter in the metadata was statistically associated with image quality for either T2 or ADC maps. Quality scores of the same modality showed low correlation across sites (r~0.2). In the challenging task of predicting ADC quality from prior T2 images, our model achieved performance comparable to current single-site models directly using ADC maps, with 83% sensitivity and 90% negative predictive value. The model showed stronger performance on in-house data (94±2% accuracy) despite being trained exclusively on multicenter external data. Rectal cross-sectional area on T2 images provided an interpretable quality metric (AUC 0.65). Conclusion: The probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.