ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Exploring Evaluation of eHealth Lifestyle Interventions for Preschool Children: A Scoping Review.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EHealth lifestyle interventions can promote positive lifestyle changes in preschool children, but they need to be evaluated to assess their effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. This scoping review aimed to examine evaluation methods, outcome measures, and methodologic strengths and weaknesses, to provide recommendations for the evaluation of eHealth lifestyle interventions for preschool children. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 6 databases for articles published up to September 29, 2023. We identified 48 articles describing 31 interventions that met our predefined eligibility criteria. These interventions predominantly targeted children's diet. The most frequently evaluated outcomes were effectiveness, acceptability, and usage. Effectiveness outcomes included, among others, dietary intake, anthropometrics, and child and parental behaviors. Acceptability was evaluated primarily as user satisfaction. Evaluation methods for effectiveness and acceptability included questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, and portable devices. Intervention usage was evaluated via logged use and self-reported data. On the basis of our findings, we present recommendations for future evaluation of eHealth interventions for preschool children. These recommendations focus on selecting relevant outcome measures and appropriate evaluation methods and on integrating and applying evaluation results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.