Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568605›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025

External Validation of Persistent Severe Acute Kidney Injury Prediction With Machine Learning Model.

Simone Zappalà, Francesca Alfieri, Andrea Ancona, Antonio M Dell'Anna, Kianoush B Kashani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Validation of a cancer population derived AKI machine learning algorithm in a general critical care scenario.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone ZappalàU-Care Medical srl, Corso Castelfidardo 30A, Torino, Italy.
Francesca AlfieriU-Care Medical srl, Corso Castelfidardo 30A, Torino, Italy.
Andrea AnconaU-Care Medical srl, Corso Castelfidardo 30A, Torino, Italy.
Antonio M Dell'AnnaDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico, Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Kianoush B KashaniDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To externally validate the persistent electronic alert (PersEA) machine learning model for predicting persistent severe acute kidney injury (psAKI), addressing the scarcity of validated prediction models. Patients and Methods: We included adult patients (18 years or older) admitted to intensive care unit with at least stage 2 acute kidney injury (AKI) at a tertiary medical center, using retrospective data collected between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2022. The data were accessed and analyzed during the period from March 1st, 2023, through July 28th, 2023. The psAKI was defined as AKI stage 3 lasting for ≥72 hours or AKI leading to death in 48 hours or kidney replacement therapy in 1 day. The performance of the PersEA model, a boosted tree algorithm fed by hourly patient data via electronic health records to provide real-time psAKI predictions, was evaluated using specific metrics that penalize late alarms. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic and the area under the precision-recall curves. Results: After screening, 4479 patients from the Mayo Clinic cohort were included in the current external validation study, with 234 (5.22%) having psAKI. Results from the Amsterdam UMCdb (531 patients, 59 [11.11%] positive) and MIMIC-III (495 patients, 57 [11.52%] positive) cohorts were obtained in a prior development study. The model demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60-0.73), and when applying the threshold that reached 0.80 sensitivity on the internal cohort, PersEA achieved 0.88 sensitivity, 0.94 specificity, and 0.47 precision, all based on Mayo Clinic data. Conclusion: The PersEA model performed excellently on an external cohort, showing that it is scalable on high-quality data with little to no tuning once a noisy training set is chosen.

Identifiers

PMID40568605
PMCPMC12190941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.