ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Skill and efficiency in Acheulian giant core reduction.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Skill and efficiency in Acheulian giant core reduction.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The beginning of the Chibanian age (0.774-0.129 Ma) is characterized by a proliferation of giant core (GC) reduction strategies across the Acheulian world, which were used to produce standardized large flake blanks for shaping large cutting tools (LCTs), such as handaxes and cleavers. Archaeological analyses of GCs have revealed that flaking strategies were often tailored to the lithological and morphological properties of boulders, while experimental research has demonstrated challenges in managing and exploiting their volumes. These insights emphasize the importance of technological skill in reducing GCs efficiently to maximize the production of standardized blanks. However, examining skill in Acheulian contexts has focused on shaping LCTs almost exclusively, while the early phases of these manufacturing chains, including raw material acquisition and blank production, have received less attention. Here, we document the role of technological skill in reducing giant quartzite cores to manufacture large flake blanks through a set of actualistic experiments that contrast expert, intermediate and novice performances. Our results show that knapping expertise is correlated with increased efficiency in exploiting core volume and creating blanks with morphometric features that are ideal for shaping LCTs. We further argue that economizing LCT shaping processes through front-loading time investment in blank production probably involved expert cognition and may have had social implications for skill development in the deep past.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.