Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568549›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Collective intermittent exploration in fish schools is mediated by visual cues.

Deze Liu, Daniel Burbano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deze LiuElectrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Daniel BurbanoElectrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7708-1289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploratory behaviour is fundamental to animal collectives, directly influencing fitness through resource acquisition and predator avoidance. Despite its ecological significance, the processes governing when and how animals initiate exploration in social contexts under varying sensory inputs remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate how the number of individuals and illumination (modulating visual input) influence zebrafish exploratory behaviour. Visual cues were quantified via opacity (field occupancy) and optic flow (relative motion). With visual input, zebrafish exhibited higher swimming activity and shorter exploratory bursts, while its absence led to more dispersed and prolonged exploration. Interestingly, fish triads without visual input exhibited longer exploration times compared to dyads. A data-driven stochastic model revealed a bistable potential landscape balancing social cohesion and exploration, modulated by a parabolic noise term driving decision-making. Visual cues biased the potential towards conspecific proximity, while their absence diminished this effect, promoting prolonged exploration. The noise term follows an entropy-like pattern analogous to a coin flip, reaching maximal uncertainty at intermediate distances and forcing individuals to break indecision between proximity and exploration. These findings point to a complex interplay between sensory input and group dynamics, underscoring the profound impact of environmental changes and the number of conspecifics on collective behaviour.

Indexed as

animal movementscollective behaviourstochastic differential equations

Identifiers

PMID40568549
PMCPMC12187415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.