ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2025
Advances in Machine Learning for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in emergency mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational comparison with emergency physician ventilator settings.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Data mining in pediatric radiology in the era of artificial intelligence.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Predicting Outcome and Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The PREMIER Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Healthcare 5.0-Driven Clinical Intelligence: The Learn-Predict-Monitor-Detect-Correct Framework for Systematic Artificial Intelligence Integration in Critical Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Electromyographic Diaphragm and Electrocardiographic Signal Analysis for Weaning Outcome Classification in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome management: recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical ventilation, a key ICU life-support tech, carries risks. ML can optimize patient management, improving clinical decisions, patient outcomes, and resource use. Objective: This review aims to summarize the current applications, challenges, and future directions of machine learning in managing mechanically ventilated patients, focusing on prediction models for extubation readiness, oxygenation management, ventilator parameter optimization, clinical prognosis, and pulmonary function assessment. Methods: Multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang Data were systematically searched for studies on machine learning in mechanical ventilation management. Keywords included mechanical ventilation, machine learning, weaning, etc. We reviewed recent studies on using machine learning to predict successful extubation, optimize oxygenation targets, personalize ventilator settings, forecast mechanical ventilation duration and clinical outcomes. The review also examined challenges of integrating machine learning into clinical practice, such as data integration, model interpretability, and real - time performance requirements. Results: Machine learning models have demonstrated significant potential in predicting successful extubation, optimizing oxygenation strategies through non-invasive blood gas prediction, and dynamically adjusting ventilator parameters using reinforcement learning. These models have also shown promise in predicting mechanical ventilation duration, clinical prognosis and pulmonary function parameters. However, challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, model generalizability, workflow integration, and the need for multicenter validation. Conclusion: Machine learning shows great potential for improving intensive care quality and efficiency in mechanically ventilated patients. However, challenges like model interpretability, real-time performance, clinical and validation remain. Future research needs to focus on these limitations via large-scale, multicenter trials, better data standardization, and improved physician training to safely and effectively integrate ML into clinical practice. Collaboration among medical, engineering, and ethical experts is also essential for advancing this promising field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.