Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568489›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2025

The ability of chitosan-stearin as an edible coating on the quality of broiler chicken meat during cold storage.

Yunilas Yunilas, Uswatun Hasanah, Trioso Purnawarman, Muheri Indra Aja Nasution

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunilas YunilasDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-5925
Uswatun HasanahDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8401-2444
Trioso PurnawarmanDivision of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-6808
Muheri Indra Aja NasutionDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8856-9668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how well fresh broiler meat may be preserved in cold storage using chitosan-stearin as an edible coating. Materials and Methods: A completely randomized design with a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and three replications was employed. Factor I represented the formula dosage (FD) (FD0 = 0% chitosan + 0% stearin; FD1 = 1.5% chitosan + 1% stearin; FD2 = 3% chitosan + 1% stearin), while Factor II represented storage time (ST) (ST0 = 0 days; ST1 = 3 days; ST2 = 6 days; ST3 = 9 days; ST4 = 12 days). Results: The results showed that the water content, cooking loss, protein content, and fat content of broiler meat were significantly affected ( Conclusion: Chitosan-stearin edible coatings with different formula doses FD and ST consistently preserve the quality of fresh broiler meat during cold storage, with average values of water content ranging from 48.97% to 53.73%, water-holding capacity from 17.52% to 34.30%, cooking loss from 10.03% to 33.19%, pH levels from 4.93 to 5.53, protein content from 14.54% to 17.46%, fat content from 20.55% to 24.21%, and no detectable presence of

Indexed as

Broiler chickenchitosancold storageedible coatingmeatstearin

Identifiers

PMID40568489
PMCPMC12186788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.