ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Imputation models and error analysis for phase contrast MR cerebral blood flow measurements in heterogeneous pediatric and adult populations.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) supports brain function and health. Cerebral blood flow is affected by normal brain development, disease, medications use, and other interventions. One method to measure CBF is phase contrast magnetic resonance (PC MR) imaging, a particularly fast and reliable method to measure blood flow through major arteries such as the internal carotid (ICA) or vertebral arteries (VA). Unfortunately, sometimes PC MR can be compromised due to errors by the technologist during image acquisition, patient movement, or complex vessel structures. Our goal was to develop mathematical models to estimate CBF for a wide age range of patients whenever 1 or more vessels are not correctly measured. To investigate this, we studied a set of 258 PC MR acquisitions from a group of 196 patients with one or three acquisitions per subject (165 single images, 31 acquisitions of 3 images) ranging in age from 0.4 to 61.3 years (mean [μ] = 13.1, standard deviation [σ] = 12.3). We deliberately excluded measurements from one or more arteries in each volunteer to mimic situations with low image quality. Subsequently, we developed mathematical models to predict the missing data. Our predictive models performed well; across the human lifespan when at least one ICA measurement was available, our normalized root mean squared error values were low (<0.137), our R-squared values were high (>0.91), and we observed high intra-class correlation coefficients (>0.951). In summary, these imputation models are effective in estimating CBF in children and adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.