ArticleJournal of veterinary research2025
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging threats and zoonotic implications of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus spp. in domesticated cats: a review.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Review
- Companion animals as potentially important reservoir of methicillin-resistant and virulent strains of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Natural Microbiota of Dogs and Cats as a Source and Vector of Resistance Genes-Clinical Significance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic connections and antimicrobial resistance in dogs and ownersFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Staphylococci commonly colonise the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals, the close contact between which may promote interspecies transmission of these microorganisms and determinants of drug resistance. Material and Methods: Material collected from animals (n = 274) and humans (n = 261) between 2019 and 2023 was studied. Samples were swabbed from six anatomical sites of each pet: the external ear canal, conjunctival sacs, nares, oral cavity, groin skin and anus. Swabs were taken from four places of each human: the vestibule of the nasal cavity, the throat near the tonsils, and the skin behind the auricle and in the elbow bend. The pets' owners and the human participants completed a questionnaire about the study subject and the subject's living environment to elucidate risk factors associated with staphylococci colonisation. Results: The prevalence of Conclusion: Monitoring the epidemiology of strains and knowing the prevalence of resistant isolates can shape preventive programmes in both veterinary and human medicine, inform appropriate therapeutic decisions and combat the phenomenon of drug resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.